peptidetrust
home / Scoreboard / Sports Technology Labs
80
/ 100
Strong

Sports Technology Labs

Worldwide

Established US vendor, very transparent: MZ Biolabs named, HPLC-MS, batch CoAs accessible before purchase.

Coverage
95%

Verified 9/10 of 10 criteria · checked 2026-07-09

Visit Sports Technology Labs (no affiliate link) → Not an affiliate link — we earn nothing from this vendor. Open vendor CoA page →

An established, highly transparent US vendor: the MZ Biolabs lab is named, testing is HPLC-MS, and batch CoAs are accessible before purchase. No online verification (MZ authenticates by phone) and no sterility data (outside the lab's scope).

Is Sports Technology Labs legit?

On PeptideTrust's 10-criterion transparency scorecard, Sports Technology Labs scores 80/100 with 95% evidence coverage. That measures how openly it documents third-party testing, not the quality or safety of any product.

Is Sports Technology Labs a scam?

We make no fraud claim either way — PeptideTrust scores documentary transparency, not criminality. Sports Technology Labs scores 80/100 with 95% evidence coverage, and the table below links to exactly what we could and couldn't verify. Thin transparency is a reason for caution, not proof of a scam; a high score is not a guarantee of product quality.

Does Sports Technology Labs do independent third-party testing?

That is exactly what our scorecard measures. Sports Technology Labs has 9 of 10 weighted criteria verified (95% coverage); each row in the table below links to the third-party certificate, the named lab and the date we checked. Read the evidence rather than trusting a badge.

Criterion-by-criterion evidence

Every score below is a recorded, dated observation. Where we could not verify a claim, the criterion is marked Unverified and excluded from the score (but it still counts against coverage).

CriterionWtFindingEvidence
Publishes CoAsThe vendor publishes at least one certificate of analysis (CoA) on its own website. 3 ✔ Yes Public page: 13 SARM CoAs and 25 peptide CoAs as images, no login. Source · 2026-07-09
Batch-level CoAsCoAs are tied to a specific batch/lot number, not a single generic certificate per product. 3 ✔ Yes "Most recent batch CoA, issued by MZ Biolabs"; lot numbers appear in the CoA images. Source · 2026-07-09
Third-party lab namedThe name of the laboratory that ran the analysis appears on the CoA. 2 ✔ Yes CoAs issued by a named lab: MZ Biolabs. Source · 2026-07-09
Independent / accredited labThe lab is independent of the vendor and/or accredited (ISO 17025), or is a recognised independent peptide lab (e.g. Janoshik, MZ Biolabs). 2 ✔ Yes MZ Biolabs is a recognised independent peptide/SARM lab, DEA-licensed, running Bruker QTOF MS (ISO 17025 not declared). Source · 2026-07-09
CoA verifiable at sourceThe CoA can be authenticated on the laboratory's own website (e.g. a verification code) — actually tested, not just claimed. 2 ✘ No MZ Biolabs offers no online verify/QR; authentication is by phone only. Source · 2026-07-09
Identity + purity methodsWhich analytical methods are identifiable on the published CoAs. 2 ? Unverified HPLC + MS "HPLC with UV + mass spectrometry"; MOTS-c cited at 99.66% HPLC purity. Source · 2026-07-09
Freshness of the latest CoADate of the most recent CoA visible on the site. 2 ? Unverified 3-12 months CoAs from 2023 to 2026, with 2026 certs present; a <3-month date could not be confirmed → lt12m (conservative). Source · 2026-07-09
CoAs accessible before purchase, no accountCoAs can be viewed without a customer account or a prior purchase. 2 ✔ Yes "Published on our website — no login required." Source · 2026-07-09
Sterility / endotoxin data publishedSterility or endotoxin (LAL) results are published in addition to purity. 1 ✘ No The lab explicitly excludes sterility/endotoxins, heavy metals and pH. Source · 2026-07-09
Public complaints / recall handlingA public recall/complaint policy, or documented handling of a disputed batch. 1 ? Unverified Not verified — no evidence on record.

Full scoring rubric on the methodology page. How affiliation is handled: read the disclosure.

Score history

  • 2026-07-09 — Added to the scorecard after the initial CoA-transparency audit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Sports Technology Labs publish third-party CoAs?
Yes. A public /coas/ page lists 13 SARM and 25 peptide CoAs as images, issued by a named lab (MZ Biolabs), with no login required.
How is the Sports Technology Labs transparency score calculated?
We score 10 weighted, evidence-backed criteria. Score = 100 × Σ(weight × points) ÷ Σ(weight of verified criteria); coverage = verified weight ÷ total weight. Affiliated and non-affiliated vendors use the exact same rubric.
Is Sports Technology Labs safe to buy from?
PeptideTrust rates documentary transparency, not product safety or medical suitability. On transparency, Sports Technology Labs scores 80/100 with 95% coverage. Peptides sold as research chemicals are not approved for human use — this is not medical advice.

Compare other vendors