vialproof
home / Scoreboard / BioLongevity Labs
85
/ 100
Strong

BioLongevity Labs

US

Solid transparency: a ~358-CoA gallery, named MDx lab (ISO 17025 re-accreditation pending), HPLC-MS, endotoxin data.

Coverage
100%

Verified 10/10 of 10 criteria · checked 2026-07-09

Visit BioLongevity Labs (no affiliate link) → Not an affiliate link — we earn nothing from this vendor. Open vendor CoA page →

Solid transparency: a gallery of ~358 CoAs, the MDx lab named (ISO 17025 in re-accreditation), HPLC-MS, and endotoxin results. Worth watching: marketing claims "3 independent labs" while the opened CoA shows only one (MDx).

Criterion-by-criterion evidence

Every score below is a recorded, dated observation. Where we could not verify a claim, the criterion is marked Unverified and excluded from the score (but it still counts against coverage).

CriterionWtFindingEvidence
Publishes CoAsThe vendor publishes at least one certificate of analysis (CoA) on its own website. 3 ✔ Yes An /all-coas/ gallery (~358 entries) plus embeds on product pages. Source · 2026-07-09
Batch-level CoAsCoAs are tied to a specific batch/lot number, not a single generic certificate per product. 3 ✔ Yes Each CoA is tied to a QC/lot number matching the vial (e.g. 261467); note the literal "Batch No." field showed "NA". Source · 2026-07-09
Third-party lab namedThe name of the laboratory that ran the analysis appears on the CoA. 2 ✔ Yes "MDx BioAnalytical Laboratory, Inc." named with logo/signatory (Jason Snitker). Source · 2026-07-09
Independent / accredited labThe lab is independent of the vendor and/or accredited (ISO 17025), or is a recognised independent peptide lab (e.g. Janoshik, MZ Biolabs). 2 ◐ Partial MDx holds ISO/IEC 17025:2017 (PJLA) but the site notes "PENDING Re-Accreditation Post-Audit March 2026"; independent but accreditation in progress; not Janoshik/MZ. Source · 2026-07-09
CoA verifiable at sourceThe CoA can be authenticated on the laboratory's own website (e.g. a verification code) — actually tested, not just claimed. 2 ◐ Partial CoAs carry a QR + CoA ID to a lab-side "CoA Search"; the search page is JS-driven and the lookup was not executed to confirm. Source · 2026-07-09
Identity + purity methodsWhich analytical methods are identifiable on the published CoAs. 2 ? Unverified HPLC + MS Both LC chromatography trace and mass spectrometry (ES+) present. Source · 2026-07-09
Freshness of the latest CoADate of the most recent CoA visible on the site. 2 ? Unverified < 3 months NAD+ lot 261467 reported 2026-05-18. Source · 2026-07-09
CoAs accessible before purchase, no accountCoAs can be viewed without a customer account or a prior purchase. 2 ✔ Yes /all-coas/ and product pages load while logged out. Source · 2026-07-09
Sterility / endotoxin data publishedSterility or endotoxin (LAL) results are published in addition to purity. 1 ◐ Partial Endotoxins PASS (≤0.05 EU/mL) verified on the opened CoA; sterility only claimed in marketing (SafeCert), not on the document. Source · 2026-07-09
Public complaints / recall handlingA public recall/complaint policy, or documented handling of a disputed batch. 1 ◐ Partial Isolated complaints (Trustpilot 3.5/5 on delivery); no recall or batch failure found, and no formal recall policy. Source · 2026-07-09

Full scoring rubric on the methodology page. How affiliation is handled: read the disclosure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BioLongevity Labs legit?
On PeptideTrust's 10-criterion transparency scorecard, BioLongevity Labs scores 85/100 with 100% evidence coverage. That measures how openly it documents third-party testing, not the quality or safety of any product.
Does BioLongevity Labs publish third-party CoAs?
Yes. An /all-coas/ gallery holds roughly 358 entries plus product-page embeds, issued by a named lab (MDx BioAnalytical) with HPLC-MS and endotoxin data.
How is the BioLongevity Labs transparency score calculated?
We score 10 weighted, evidence-backed criteria. Score = 100 × Σ(weight × points) ÷ Σ(weight of verified criteria); coverage = verified weight ÷ total weight. Affiliated and non-affiliated vendors use the exact same rubric.

Compare other vendors